Environmental Justice: Obama-Era Politics Override Guideline of Law

In every Soviet-era military unit, the long shadow of totalitarian political control hung over daily operations. A political commissar served alongside commanding military policeman’s to ensure that communist purity was maintained.

j3aWe’re seeing the exact same political strong-arm in President Barack Obama’s executive companies, especially in the raw enforcement of so-called ecological justice.


Readers will recall Tom Clancy’s The Hunt for Red October, in which the political officer, appropriately named Ivan Putin, brought a missile key on the nuclear sub. The commissars were not accountable to military leaders, only to the political directorates. Soviet soldiers and sailors who were judged to be politically deviant underwent the harshest of penalties.

Why do we look back at that frightening model of political control? During the 7 and a half years of the Obama administration, the consultation of different czars, the steady circulation of executive orders, and the explosive growth of regulative power far beyond the black and white letters of statutes passed by Congress have triggered political commissar-style federal government enforcement.

This is anathema to constitutional separation of powers and checks and balances.

Born throughout the Clinton administration by executive order and mainly inactive during the Bush years, ecological justice has ended up being an overarching political commissar-style ideological mandate in as numerous as 15 executive agencies, including and especially the Environmental Protection Agency.

j3bCarefully crafted to prevent the look of being a rulemaking, which would subject the shadowy office in each agency to public, judicial and congressional review, the Obama-era environmental justice initiative nevertheless tracks, evaluates, and evaluates policies to ensure they are ecologically simply. It likewise has a hand in issuing public tax dollars in the form of grants to all sorts of neighborhood groups and agenda-driven conservationists to inform the public in the form of political demonstrations and projects versus personal industry.

In short, the limited statutory authority of executive companies to do the work of regulating has been exceeded by the political. Formal actions by companies are increasingly evaluated through the political prism of the Orwellian ecological justice movement, now cloaked with government power.

For years, under the banner of environmental justice, the federal government has actually looked for to broaden its territory, control, and impact. Through methods mostly exempt from any meaningful notice and remark treatments, the federal government grants itself endless power to figure out whether a neighborhood will be negatively impacted by an ecological governing choice and to regulate actions associated with that community.

In the most current example, the Department of Interior s 2016-20 Draft Environmental Justice Strategic Plan was, strangely, open for official public comment. In May, Southeastern Legal Foundation submitted an official public comment to accentuate numerous key infirmities in the proposed plan. In addition to bringing about transformative growth to the Department of Interior’s regulatory authority without congressional permission, the proposed plan straight conflicts with numerous existing federal laws.

Specifically, its focus on environmental effects on minority, low-income, or tribal populations is both narrower and broader than Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The statute bars disparate treatment, not out of proportion results; safeguards all groups rather than just minority populations; and says absolutely nothing about low-income or tribal populations. The administration’s arbitrary enforcement of environmental justice makes the exact same conduct legal with regard to some Americans however not others.

According to the proposed strategy, the Department of Interior plans on enhancing its use of social outreach tools the same tools that the EPA used to perform its grassroots lobbying project to support its expansive definition of waters of the United States that the Southeastern Legal Foundation is challenging in federal court. As it presses ecological political accuracy and looks for to expand its impact, the Department of Interior is quickly approaching the harmful line between notifying the public and lobbying the general public.Feel free to visit sue a bank for more information.

The Department of Interior’s proposed plan is constitutionally problematic in that it proposes to safeguard some racial and ethnic groups, however not others ostensibly denying the equivalent defense of laws.


Where’s the justice because? The federal government’s dependence on race as its primary consideration for safeguarding one group over another from supposed ecological damages runs afoul of the Constitution and undergoes the strictest level of examination. Stay tuned as ecological justice begins to get important legal and congressional evaluation.

Report slams Israel’s military law enforcement system

Mentioning a raft of deep systemic failures, human rights group B’Tselem has announced that it will not work together with Israel’s military law enforcement system.
For the past 25 years, B’Tselem, which records Israeli human rights offenses in the occupied Palestinian areas, has functioned as a “subcontractor” for the system by submitting grievances about soldiers’ alleged misconduct, gathering relevant documents and proof, and asking for updates for afflicted Palestinian households.

While the goal was to help to bring justice to Palestinian victims and deter future misbehavior, the reality has actually been the opposite, B’Tselem said in a scathing report launched on Wednesday.

“B’Tselem’s cooperation with the military investigation and enforcement system has not attained justice, rather providing authenticity to the occupation program and assisting to whitewash it,” the report noted.

“B’Tselem wills no more play a part in the pretence posed by the military law enforcement system and will no longer refer grievances to it. The fight for human rights will be much better served by knocking this system and exposing it for what it is.”

The report details a number of cases in which Palestinians have been eliminated or injured by Israeli soldiers under questionable circumstances, but after a series of apparent investigative failures, no one was held accountable.

In one example, Wadi Samarah, 15, was fatally shot in the back of the neck by an Israeli soldier in the occupied West Bank town of Jenin in September 2007. Samarah, who was targeted as he ran from a group of youths who had been tossing stones at military cars, was offered no previous caution before the rubber-coated steel bullet was fired to his head, according to witness accounts.

The case was closed for “lack of sufficient proof” in early 2014, more than 6 years after Samarah’s death.

This case is by no means unique. Since the start of the second Intifada in 2000, B’Tselem has requested examinations into 739 cases where soldiers killed or injured Palestinians, used them as human shields, or damaged their property.

In 25 percent of these cases, no investigation was ever released. In nearly half, or 343 cases, an examination was launched but consequently closed with no action taken. More than 100 cases are still under processing, however in all of those that have actually gone through the system, charges were laid in just 25, with another 13 referred for corrective action.

These results are the result of incompetent investigations that fail to get at the fact, with few efforts made to collect external proof or challenge soldiers’ statements, B’Tselem stated.j3d

“The military law enforcement system is afflicted by a host of problems in the standard method it is run: The system is unattainable to Palestinian plaintiffs, who cannot submit problems with the MPIU [Military Police Investigations Unit] directly and need to depend on human rights organizations or attorneys to submit the grievances on their behalf,” the report discovered.

“The processing of each grievance lasts months, and even years, so that often sufficient soldiers who are the subject of the complaint are no more under military jurisdiction.”

Acquiring updates about cases in the system is likewise laden with problems, as the Military Advocate General Corps operates under a blanket of secrecy, B’Tselem stated: “Any attempt to get info from them needs repeated interactions and in many cases, the info that is eventually provided is incomplete.”

Inquired about B’Tselem’s statement, an Israeli army representative kept that the military justice system is “an independent and professional entity”, noting any grievances submitted through this system are penetrated and, when called for, an examination is released.

“For years the [Israeli army] has been receiving information relating to occasions which wander off from the path of exactly what is anticipated by [army] personnel … All information gotten is analyzed thoroughly,” the spokesperson said, noting the Israeli army would continue to “serve as needed to implement the law and maintain the standards” among soldiers. The criticisms cited by B’Tselem, however, have actually been echoed by other organizations, including the Adalah legal centre, which promotes for the rights of Palestinians in Israel and the occupied territories.

“Our experience engaging with Israel’s investigatory systems for many years reveals that these mechanisms do not adhere to the worldwide requirements of independence, impartiality, efficiency, punctuality and transparency,” Adalah lawyer Nadeem Shehadeh told Al Jazeera.

“As such, the naturally flawed structures of Israel’s systems make it almost difficult to get criminal investigations, prosecutions, and penalty of perpetrators of serious offenses of international law.”

Amongst the essential criticisms of Israel’s military police system is its failure to penetrate the legality or rationale of the instructions underlying soldiers’ actions, with investigations focusing narrowly on the conduct of implicated soldiers.

In 2014, after Israeli soldiers fatally shot 14-year-old Yusef al-Shawamreh for breaking through Israel’s separation fence to access his household’s farmland, the case was swiftly closed with no charges laid.

B’Tselem pointed to numerous shortages in the investigative process, consisting of a failure to analyze the “terrible reasoning” of the armed forces obvious plan to depend on ambush for Palestinians breaking through the barrier and to intentionally damage them as a deterrent to others.

j3eOn average, in a sample of cases in between 2000 and 2011, B’Tselem discovered that it took four years from the time of the occurrence to the conclusion of processing the case. In case charges are eventually laid, “this will occur long after the incident when the witnesses’ memory of occasions has actually grown dimmer and the proof has actually disappeared”, hindering the possibility of a fair trial.

The form of an operating justice system enables Israeli officials to deny claims that Israel does not enforce the law on soldiers who damage Palestinians, B’Tselem stated, noting it would not prop up a system “whose real function is determined by its capability to continue to effectively cover crimes and safeguard perpetrators”.

B’Tselem representative Sari Michaela told Al Jazeera that while Palestinians would still have other choices for moderating their cases, this action would help to draw spotlight to the system’s severe flaws.

“Palestinians will still have the ability to approach other organizations, or private legal representatives, but we will advise individuals who ask us to do this that we consider it disadvantageous,” Michael stated.

Pot raids aren’t political, just a matter of law: DiManno

Cannabis dispensaries had actually ended up being the brand-new Dollar stores.

Just as common around the city, just as slapdash in their stock, simply as fill-your-cart available to anybody with a few bucks in their pocket. And not necessarily a medical prescription to choose.j3f

That might be the nirvana typical as visualized by pot activists but it’s undoubtedly not exactly what the federal government wanted when Health Minister Jane Philpott announced Canada would legislate leisure cannabis within a year. Though we were to in fact understand what the Liberals are considering or how they will present commercial availability, except I bet it will be a governmental monster.


Honestly, the pop-up dispensaries business owners getting a freewheeling get on the presumed dope market, their numbers doubled since March– remind me of the sex parlors galore that plagued Toronto in the late 70’s, brought to heel just after the murder of a 12-year-old shoeshine boy.

Many yesterdays back, that was. But for a time, the city was unrecognizable, a rub-a-dub Pottersville where the squish joints really operated as bawdy houses, prostitution on the in/out hoof.

j3hObviously I’m not stating that marijuana profiteers are akin to pimps. They’re not virtuous humanitarians providing a public service either. They are, as witnessed by the authorities chief’s chaotic press conference Friday, a loud-mouthed, belligerent and bullying bunch who reject the apparently charming concept that criminal laws should apply to them. And they’ve drawn vitality from the tacitly lawless environment that has actually been developed by Ottawa’s pre-decriminalization tension.

As federal legislation stands, there is no such thing as a legal cannabis dispensary. There are just a few lots government-licensed distributors allowed to deliver by mail order, specifically cannabis to approved medical clients. (A federal court order in February struck down the prohibition on people growing their own medical pot for personal use.).

The system in location is awkward and bothersome. It also created an oligopoly. On the positive side, it provided a method for quality control for medical clients. Establishing a material standard for THC, to name a few components, is an affordable requirement, whether for medical pot or the legal leisure pot of the future.

Chief Mark Saunders stressed that concern in justifying the incentive behind Project Claudia, Thursday’s low-energy sweep of plainly illegal dispensaries around Toronto.

Project Claudia is not an attack on legal production, distribution or buying of cannabis for medical purposes. Pointing to the selection of products that had been taken from 43 places robbed 279 kilograms of dried cannabis, 24 kilos of hash, 30 kilos of cannabis resin, 27 kilos of marijuana and THC tablets in oil and pill type, and a massive quantity of edibles, the 142 kilograms of cookies, 129 kilos of sweets, soda and jams and lollipops Saunders added: There is no quality control on these items and, as you can see, they’re marketed in a manner to disguise the unidentified and uncontrolled amount of THC in the items.

j3iHalf of the dispensaries were positioned within 300 metres of a school. Even in liberal-minded territories such as Vancouver, bylaws forbid dispensaries that operate under local bylaws and all such bylaws would eventually be surpassed by what the feds design in their decriminalization/legalization goal from situating in close proximity to schools, recreational centers and other places where quickly affected youth collect.

This is not about the charges; this is about public safety, that’s what my issue is, said Saunders, as he was repeatedly interrupted by hecklers.

They desire what they desire. How they want. Where they desire.

They put on to offer a rat s ass about the teenage kids you, as moms and dads or guardians, are aiming to steer clear of recreational drugs because they do, in fact, impact extremely on learning, on truancy, on peer pressure that shunts young lives off the rails. That is not an exaggeration. If you were to have kids, you have no concept about the everyday difficulties of child-rearing in a society bombarded by damaging messages and seductive temptations.

Homeowners have been appalled by the infringement of dispensaries in their communities. Their grievances activated Project Claudia. These complaints were substantive in nature, stated Steve Watts, Acting inspector with the Toronto drug squad. Petitions and in excess of 50 and 70 people, just to offer you an idea of the type of grievances that were coming forward in relation to these illegal store front dispensaries.

Twenty-two grams of powder cocaine took at one location.

The evangelists of pot will countenance no restraints, no small amounts restrictions. They willfully neglected the warnings released on May 18 that raids were imminent. Letters sent out by the city’s licensing and standards department to all dispensary operators, describing infractions of zoning bylaws that could, would, result in charges.

Blow it out your wazoo was the reaction.

I believe they relished it, this minute of their contrived victimhood St. Maryjane among the Martyrs– taking the platform of a press conference with legions of media present.

This is worse than anything we saw under the Harper government! accosted Jodie Emery, very long time pot activist and married to Mark Emery, Canada s so-called Prince of Pot.

I think Canadians need to right away call Justin Trudeau, John Tory and Bill Blair and ask why we’re seeing more individuals being damaged under their so-called legalization than we ever saw under Stephen Harper s anti-marijuana policies. This has to do with protecting the business revenues of stock-market businesses that have sent out police to arrest people to protect their own monetary interest. That is sick and revolting and despicable. Shame on the Toronto cops service and shame on the Toronto local government for hurting serene individuals.

Pooh to 50 approximately complainants, she insisted, compared with 50,000 ill people last night who were stressed and ill and their physicians say, no, I won’t give you medical cannabis.

These dispensaries do no harm. The police are the biggest gang of weapons that went and closed down tranquil companies.

Spare me. If there’s a genuine rip-off afoot, it’s the variety of people who’ve safe legal cannabis prescriptions for bogus medical conditions. The last Canadian Alcohol and substance abuse Monitoring Survey released by Health Canada (in 2011) pegged the estimated number of medical cannabis users at 420,000.

However they will demand conflating the medical users with the leisure users, clinging to coattails of legality.

None of Thursday’s raids were targeted at interfering with legal cannabis distributors or consumers with a medical prescription.j3g

In no way, shape or form did we look at or consider jailing individuals for property, said Saunders. This is strictly for those individuals that are trafficking in narcotics.

Till Ottawa legislates pot, that’s exactly what you are, folk’s traffickers, no various from the gang-banger marketing crack in the park. Chasing the cash.